Bone microstrain values of 1-piece and 2-piece implants subjected to mechanical loading

Noga Harel*, Inbar Eshkol-Yogev, Dana Piek, Shiri Livne, David Lavi, Zeev Ormianer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


PURPOSE:: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the strain levels in peri-implant bone as generated by 1-piece (1P) and 2-piece (2P) implant systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: The implants (1P and 2P) were placed into bovine bone according to the manufacturerÊs protocol. Four linear strain gauges were placed around each implant neck and apex. Each model was loaded in static loading by a material testing machine in ascending forces ranging from 20 to 120 N. Microstrains (μ[Latin Small Letter Open E]) generated in the surrounding bone were measured by a strain gauge and recorded. RESULTS:: Recorded microstrains were significantly higher for 1P implants than for 2P implants. Average recorded microstrain values were significantly lower in the neck (71.6 and 17.3 μs) compared with the apical (132 and 60 μs) regions of 1P and 2P implants, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:: Within the limitations of this study, highest microstrains were generated in apical regions regardless of implant design, but the 2P implant ap-peared to provide a stress-damping effect in both the cervical and apical regions compared with the 1P implant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-281
Number of pages5
JournalImplant Dentistry
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2013


  • bone
  • microstrain 1-piece implant


Dive into the research topics of 'Bone microstrain values of 1-piece and 2-piece implants subjected to mechanical loading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this