Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bone marrow versus mobilized peripheral blood stem cells in haploidentical transplants using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide

  • Annalisa Ruggeri*
  • , Myriam Labopin
  • , Andrea Bacigalupo
  • , Zafer Gülbas
  • , Yener Koc
  • , Didier Blaise
  • , Benedetto Bruno
  • , Giuseppe Irrera
  • , Johanna Tischer
  • , Jose Luiz Diez-Martin
  • , Luca Castagna
  • , Fabio Ciceri
  • , Mohamad Mohty
  • , Arnon Nagler
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Université Pierre et Marie Curie
  • University and San Martino Hospital of Genoa
  • Anadolu Medical Center Hospital
  • Medical Park Hospitals
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes
  • Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
  • Centro Unico Regionale Trapianti
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Complutense University
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • San Raffaele Scientific Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

152 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in haploidentical bone marrow (BM) transplants using posttransplantion cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is low, whereas GVHD using mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) ranges between 30% and 40%. METHODS: To evaluate the effect of stem cell source in haploidentical transplantation with PT-Cy, we analyzed 451 patients transplanted for acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. RESULTS: BM was used in 260 patients, and PBSC were used in 191 patients. The median follow-up was 21 months. Engraftment was lower in BM (92% vs 95%, P < 0.001). BM was associated with a lower incidence of stage II-IV and stage III-IV acute GVHD (21% vs 38%, P ≤.01; and 4% vs 14%, P <.01, respectively). No difference in chronic GVHD, relapse, or nonrelapse mortality were found for PBSC or BM. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 55% versus 56% (P =.57) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 49% versus 54% (P =.74) for BM and PBSC, respectively. On multivariate analysis, PBSC were associated with an increased risk of stage II-IV (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; P <.001) and stage III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 3.8; P <.001). For LFS and OS, reduced intensity conditioning was the only factor associated with treatment failure (LFS: HR, 1.40; P =.04) and relapse (HR, 1.62; P =.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute leukemia in first or second remission receiving haploidentical transplantation with PT-Cy, the use of PBSC increases the risk of acute GVHD, whereas survival outcomes are comparable. Cancer 2018;124:1428-37.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1428-1437
Number of pages10
JournalCancer
Volume124
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2018

Funding

Funders
Institute of Infection and Immunity
Ministero della Salute
Tel Aviv University

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • acute graft-versus-host disease
    • acute leukemia
    • haploidentical transplantation
    • posttransplantation cyclophosphamide
    • stem cell source

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bone marrow versus mobilized peripheral blood stem cells in haploidentical transplants using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this