Bone Density Among Infants of Gestational Diabetic Mothers and Macrosomic Neonates

Irit Schushan-Eisen, Mor Cohen, Leah Leibovitch, Ayala Maayan-Metzger, Tzipora Strauss*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Decreased bone density has been found among infants of diabetic mothers and among large-for-gestational-age newborns. To evaluate which etiologies (physical or metabolic effect) have the greatest impact on neonatal bone density. A case–control study was conducted that included two study groups: one comprising 20 appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) infants of gestational diabetic mothers (IGDM) and matched controls, and the other comprising 20 macrosomic infants (birth weight > 4 kg) and matched controls. Bone density was examined along the tibia bone using quantitative ultrasound that measured speed of sound. Bone density among the group of macrosomic infants was significantly lower than among the control group (2,976 vs. 3,120 m/s respectively, p < 0.005). No differences in bone density were found between infants of diabetic mothers and their controls (3,005 vs. 3,043 m/s respectively, p = 0.286). Low bone density was predicted only by birth weight (for every increase of 100 g) (OR 1.148 [CI 1.014–1.299], p = 0.003). Bone density was found to be low among macrosomic newborn infants, whereas among AGA–IGDM infants bone density was similar to that of the control group. These findings strengthen the hypothesis that reduced fetal movements secondary to fetal macrosomia constitute the mechanism for reduced bone density.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)578-582
Number of pages5
JournalMaternal and Child Health Journal
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2015

Keywords

  • Bone density
  • Infants of diabetic mothers
  • Large-for-gestational-age
  • Macrosomia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bone Density Among Infants of Gestational Diabetic Mothers and Macrosomic Neonates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this