Bergmann's Rule - what's in a name?

Shai Meiri*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Despite the great interest it generates, the definition of Bergmann's Rule is vague and often contested. Debate focuses on whether the rule should be described in terms of pattern or process, what taxa it should apply to and what taxonomic level it should be associated with. Here I review the historical development of studies of Bergmann's Rule. I suggest that Bergmann thought that his rule should be strongest at the intra-specific level, rather than between closely related species as is usually thought. I argue that the rule is a pattern that can be studied regardless of mechanism in any taxon and at any taxonomic level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-207
Number of pages5
JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2011


  • Assemblage level
  • Bergmann's Rule
  • Interspecific
  • Intraspecific
  • Latitude
  • Pattern
  • Process
  • Temperature


Dive into the research topics of 'Bergmann's Rule - what's in a name?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this