TY - JOUR
T1 - Beethoven's last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles
T2 - Cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context
AU - Eitan, Zohar
AU - Timmers, Renee
N1 - Funding Information:
We are thankful to Richard Ashley, Candace Brower, Robert Gjerdingen, and Yeshayahu Shen for useful comments and practical assistance. Thanks are also due to David Steinberg and Ilana Galenter for assistance in statistical analysis, and to Mordechai Adler and Golan Gur for their help in data collection. This study was supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant No. 800/02-27.0 to the 1st author and an Israel–USA Binational Science Foundation (BSF) Grant No. 2005-524 to the 1st author and Lawrence Marks. A partial version of the study was presented at the 9th International Congress on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC9), Bologna, Italy, August 22–26, 2006.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - Though auditory pitch is customarily mapped in Western cultures onto spatial verticality (high-low), both anthropological reports and cognitive studies suggest that pitch may be mapped onto a wide variety of other domains. We collected a total number of 35 pitch mappings and investigated in four experiments how these mappings are used and structured. In particular, we inquired (1) how Western subjects apply Western and non-Western metaphors to "high" and "low" pitches, (2) whether mappings applied in an abstract conceptual task are similarly applied by listeners to actual music, (3) how mappings of spatial height relate to these pitch mappings, and (4) how mappings of "high" and "low" pitch associate with other dimensions, in particular quantity, size, intensity and valence. The results show strong agreement among Western participants in applying familiar and unfamiliar metaphors for pitch, in both an abstract, conceptual task (Exp. 1) and in a music listening task (Exp. 2), indicating that diverse cross-domain mappings for pitch exist latently besides the common verticality metaphor. Furthermore, limited overlap between mappings of spatial height and pitch height was found, suggesting that, the ubiquity of the verticality metaphor in Western usage notwithstanding, cross-domain pitch mappings are largely independent of that metaphor, and seem to be based upon other underlying dimensions. Part of the discrepancy between spatial height and pitch height is that, for pitch, "up" is not necessarily "more," nor is it necessarily "good." High pitch is only "more" for height, intensity and brightness. It is "less" for mass, size and quantity. We discuss implications of these findings for music and speech prosody, and their relevance to notions of embodied cognition and of cross-domain magnitude representation.
AB - Though auditory pitch is customarily mapped in Western cultures onto spatial verticality (high-low), both anthropological reports and cognitive studies suggest that pitch may be mapped onto a wide variety of other domains. We collected a total number of 35 pitch mappings and investigated in four experiments how these mappings are used and structured. In particular, we inquired (1) how Western subjects apply Western and non-Western metaphors to "high" and "low" pitches, (2) whether mappings applied in an abstract conceptual task are similarly applied by listeners to actual music, (3) how mappings of spatial height relate to these pitch mappings, and (4) how mappings of "high" and "low" pitch associate with other dimensions, in particular quantity, size, intensity and valence. The results show strong agreement among Western participants in applying familiar and unfamiliar metaphors for pitch, in both an abstract, conceptual task (Exp. 1) and in a music listening task (Exp. 2), indicating that diverse cross-domain mappings for pitch exist latently besides the common verticality metaphor. Furthermore, limited overlap between mappings of spatial height and pitch height was found, suggesting that, the ubiquity of the verticality metaphor in Western usage notwithstanding, cross-domain pitch mappings are largely independent of that metaphor, and seem to be based upon other underlying dimensions. Part of the discrepancy between spatial height and pitch height is that, for pitch, "up" is not necessarily "more," nor is it necessarily "good." High pitch is only "more" for height, intensity and brightness. It is "less" for mass, size and quantity. We discuss implications of these findings for music and speech prosody, and their relevance to notions of embodied cognition and of cross-domain magnitude representation.
KW - Auditory pitch
KW - Cross-domain mapping
KW - Metaphor
KW - Music cognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76349119890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.013
DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.013
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 20036356
AN - SCOPUS:76349119890
SN - 0010-0277
VL - 114
SP - 405
EP - 422
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
IS - 3
ER -