TY - JOUR
T1 - Avoidance of Coronary Angiography in High-Risk Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
T2 - The ACSIS Registry Findings
AU - Jaffe, Ronen
AU - Karkabi, Basheer
AU - Goldenberg, Ilan
AU - Shlomo, Nir
AU - Vorobeichik, Dina
AU - Zafrir, Barak
AU - Shiran, Avinoam
AU - Adawi, Salim
AU - Iakobishvili, Zaza
AU - Beigel, Roy
AU - Rubinshtein, Ronen
AU - Flugelman, Moshe Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Background/purpose: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high-risk for recurrent coronary syndromes, heart failure and death. Early coronary intervention combined with medications reduces these risks. The ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS) is conducted over a 2-month period, every 2–3 years. ACSIS includes all patients discharged with a diagnosis of ACS from the 24 coronary care units and cardiology departments in Israel. We compared clinical profiles and 1-year survival between ACS patients who did and did not undergo coronary angiography. Methods/materials: We reviewed ACSIS for the period 2002–2013. Results: The prognosis of patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization (N = 2078) was significantly worse than for patients who underwent angiography (N = 9550). Avoidance of angiography was less common in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients than in non-STEMI/unstable angina (NSTEMI/UAP) patients (13% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Among NSTEMI/UAP patients, those who did not undergo angiography were older (mean: 71 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001), had higher incidences of diabetes (47% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), and renal (55% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) and heart failure (35% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) on admission, compared to those who underwent angiography. Even patients that underwent only diagnostic angiography had had a better prognosis than patients who did not undergo angiography. After propensity score matching for the major differences mentioned above, survival was still significantly better for patients who underwent angiography. Conclusion: ACS patients who did not undergo coronary angiography had higher-risk clinical profiles and worse 1-year survival than ACS patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography was independently associated with higher mortality. Data over 10 years were reviewed from a national registry of acute coronary syndrome. Patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization were older and with more comorbidities than patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography remained independently associated with 1-year mortality.
AB - Background/purpose: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high-risk for recurrent coronary syndromes, heart failure and death. Early coronary intervention combined with medications reduces these risks. The ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS) is conducted over a 2-month period, every 2–3 years. ACSIS includes all patients discharged with a diagnosis of ACS from the 24 coronary care units and cardiology departments in Israel. We compared clinical profiles and 1-year survival between ACS patients who did and did not undergo coronary angiography. Methods/materials: We reviewed ACSIS for the period 2002–2013. Results: The prognosis of patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization (N = 2078) was significantly worse than for patients who underwent angiography (N = 9550). Avoidance of angiography was less common in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients than in non-STEMI/unstable angina (NSTEMI/UAP) patients (13% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Among NSTEMI/UAP patients, those who did not undergo angiography were older (mean: 71 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001), had higher incidences of diabetes (47% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), and renal (55% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) and heart failure (35% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) on admission, compared to those who underwent angiography. Even patients that underwent only diagnostic angiography had had a better prognosis than patients who did not undergo angiography. After propensity score matching for the major differences mentioned above, survival was still significantly better for patients who underwent angiography. Conclusion: ACS patients who did not undergo coronary angiography had higher-risk clinical profiles and worse 1-year survival than ACS patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography was independently associated with higher mortality. Data over 10 years were reviewed from a national registry of acute coronary syndrome. Patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization were older and with more comorbidities than patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography remained independently associated with 1-year mortality.
KW - 1-Year mortality
KW - Acute coronary syndrome
KW - Coronary angiography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077171643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.021
DO - 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.021
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 31883979
AN - SCOPUS:85077171643
SN - 1553-8389
VL - 21
SP - 1230
EP - 1236
JO - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
JF - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
IS - 10
ER -