Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual speech perception by individuals with cochlear implants versus individuals with hearing aids

Tova Most*, Hilla Rothem, Luntz Michal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

The researchers evaluated the contribution of cochlear implants (CIs) to speech perception by a sample of prelingually deaf individuals implanted after age 8 years. This group was compared with a group with profound hearing impairment (HA-P), and with a group with severe hearing impairment (HA-S), both of which used hearing aids. Words and sentences were presented to the auditory channel alone, the visual channel alone, and the combined auditory-visual channel. Some of the results indicated better performance of the CI group than the HA-P group, thus indicating the advantage of CIs over hearing aids for "late" implantees, especially under difficult listening conditions. In addition, all participants relied on visual information under difficult auditory conditions. These last outcomes suggest that intervention with CI users should include exposure to visual as well as auditory information and should emphasize auditory-visual integration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-292
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Annals of the Deaf
Volume154
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual speech perception by individuals with cochlear implants versus individuals with hearing aids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this