Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings

Moshe Glickman, Dominique Lamy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although expressions of facial emotion hold a special status in attention relative to other complex objects, whether they summon our attention automatically and against our intentions remains a debated issue. Studies supporting the strong view that attentional capture by facial expressions of emotion is entirely automatic reported that a unique (singleton) emotional face distractor interfered with search for a target that was also unique on a different dimension. Participants could therefore search for the odd-one out face to locate the target and attentional capture by irrelevant emotional faces might be contingent on the adoption of an implicit set for singletons. Here, confirming this hypothesis, an irrelevant emotional face captured attention when the target was the unique face with a discrepant orientation, both when this orientation was unpredictable and when it remained constant. By contrast, no such capture was observed when the target could not be found by monitoring displays for a discrepant face and participants had to search for a face with a specific orientation. Our findings show that attentional capture by emotional faces is not purely stimulus driven and thereby resolve the apparent inconsistency that prevails in the literature on the automaticity of attentional capture by emotional faces.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-314
Number of pages12
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Feb 2018

Funding

FundersFunder number
Israel Science Foundation1475/12, 1286/16

    Keywords

    • Emotional faces
    • attentional capture
    • bottom-up
    • contingent capture
    • top-down

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this