Assortative social learning and its implications for human (and animal?) societies

Edith Katsnelson, Arnon Lotem, Marcus W. Feldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Choosing from whom to learn is an important element of social learning. It affects learner success and the profile of behaviors in the population. Because individuals often differ in their traits and capabilities, their benefits from different behaviors may also vary. Homophily, or assortment, the tendency of individuals to interact with other individuals with similar traits, is known to affect the spread of behaviors in humans. We introduce models to study the evolution of assortative social learning (ASL), where assorting on a trait acts as an individual-specific mechanism for filtering relevant models from which to learn when that trait varies. We show that when the trait is polymorphic, ASL may maintain a stable behavioral polymorphism within a population (independently of coexistence with individual learning in a population). We explore the evolution of ASL when assortment is based on a nonheritable or partially heritable trait, and when ASL competes with different non-ASL strategies: oblique (learning from the parental generation) and vertical (learning from the parent). We suggest that the tendency to assort may be advantageous in the context of social learning, and that ASL might be an important concept for the evolutionary theory of social learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1894-1906
Number of pages13
JournalEvolution; international journal of organic evolution
Volume68
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Keywords

  • Assortment
  • Homophily
  • Model choice strategies
  • Phenotypic asymmetry
  • Social learning strategies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assortative social learning and its implications for human (and animal?) societies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this