TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing sociodemographic differences (or lack thereof) in prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects
T2 - A population-based study
AU - EPICARD Study Group
AU - Khoshnood, Babak
AU - Lelong, Nathalie
AU - Andrieu, Thibaut
AU - Houyel, Lucile
AU - Bonnet, Damien
AU - Jouannic, Jean Marie
AU - Goffinet, François
AU - Calderon, Johanna
AU - Candilis, Drina
AU - Delezoide, Anne Lise
AU - De Vigan, Catherine
AU - Magnier, Suzel
AU - Magny, Jean François
AU - Rambaud, Caroline
AU - Salomon, Dominique
AU - Vodovar, Véronique
AU - Thieulin, Anne Claire
AU - Chausson, Maggy
AU - Brinis, Anissa
AU - Faure, Laure
AU - Delattre, Maryline
AU - Treluyer, Jean Marc
AU - Bréart, Gérard
AU - Cabrol, Dominique
AU - Sérraf, Alain
AU - Sidi, Daniel
AU - Voyer, Marcel
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objectives: Our main objective was to assess sociodemographic differences in the probability of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects (CHD); we also looked at differences in termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). Design: Prospective cohort observational study. Setting: Population-based cohort of CHD (live births, TOPFA, fetal deaths) born to women residing in the Greater Paris area (Paris and its surrounding suburbs, N=317 538 total births). Participants: 2867 cases of CHD, including 2348 (82%) live births, 466 (16%) TOPFA and 53 (2%) fetal deaths. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Differences in the probability of prenatal diagnosis by maternal occupation, geographic origin and place of residence; differences in the probability of TOPFA. Results: 29.1% (95% CI 27.5% to 30.8%) of all CHD were prenatally diagnosed. Probability of prenatal diagnosis was similar by maternal occupation, geographic origin and place of residence. In contrast, there were substantial differences in the probability of TOPFA by maternal geographic origin; differences by maternal occupation and place of residence were generally smaller and not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that an appropriate health system organisation aimed at providing universal, reimbursed specialised services to all women can provide comparable access to prenatal diagnosis for all sociodemographic groups. In contrast, we found substantial differences in TOPFA for women of different geographic origins, which may reflect women's preferences that should be respected, but that can nonetheless lead to the situation where families with fewer resources will be disproportionately responsible for care of newborns with more severe forms of CHD.
AB - Objectives: Our main objective was to assess sociodemographic differences in the probability of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects (CHD); we also looked at differences in termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). Design: Prospective cohort observational study. Setting: Population-based cohort of CHD (live births, TOPFA, fetal deaths) born to women residing in the Greater Paris area (Paris and its surrounding suburbs, N=317 538 total births). Participants: 2867 cases of CHD, including 2348 (82%) live births, 466 (16%) TOPFA and 53 (2%) fetal deaths. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Differences in the probability of prenatal diagnosis by maternal occupation, geographic origin and place of residence; differences in the probability of TOPFA. Results: 29.1% (95% CI 27.5% to 30.8%) of all CHD were prenatally diagnosed. Probability of prenatal diagnosis was similar by maternal occupation, geographic origin and place of residence. In contrast, there were substantial differences in the probability of TOPFA by maternal geographic origin; differences by maternal occupation and place of residence were generally smaller and not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that an appropriate health system organisation aimed at providing universal, reimbursed specialised services to all women can provide comparable access to prenatal diagnosis for all sociodemographic groups. In contrast, we found substantial differences in TOPFA for women of different geographic origins, which may reflect women's preferences that should be respected, but that can nonetheless lead to the situation where families with fewer resources will be disproportionately responsible for care of newborns with more severe forms of CHD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962664473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009353
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009353
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 27009144
AN - SCOPUS:84962664473
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 6
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 3
M1 - e009353
ER -