TY - JOUR
T1 - Are Gait Indices Sensitive Enough to Reflect the Effect of Ankle Foot Orthosis on Gait Impairment in Cerebral Palsy Diplegic Patients?
AU - Danino, Barry
AU - Erel, Snir
AU - Kfir, Meital
AU - Khamis, Sam
AU - Batt, Reuven
AU - Hemo, Yoram
AU - Wientroub, Shlomo
AU - Hayek, Shlomo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Background: Neuromuscular impairments may compromise gait function in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). As such, ambulatory children with CP often use ankle foot orthosis (AFO) to facilitate and optimize their ability to walk. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the different gait indices, the Gillette Gait Index (GGI), the Gait Deviation Index (GDI), and the Gait Profile Score (GPS), reflect the improved gait that was previously shown using AFO. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 53 studies on children with spastic diplegic CP. All had undergone a comprehensive gait study and were analyzed while walking, both barefoot and with their braces, in the same session. Kinematic and temporal spatial data were determined and summarized by 3 methods: GPS, GDI, and GGI. Results: Significant differences were found between the barefoot condition and the AFO conditions for temporal and kinematic parameters: changes in GGI, GDI, and GPS were not statistically significant, with an improvement of 9.33% in GGI (P=0.448) and no change in GDI and GPS. Conclusions: The use of AFO in diplegic CP children caused a statistically significant improvement in temporal and kinematic parameters. Interestingly, it was found that this improvement was not reflected by GGI, GDI, or GPS. These findings might suggest that gait indices, as outcome measures, may sometimes not reflect all the effects of specific interventions. Level of Evidence: Level III-retrospective study.
AB - Background: Neuromuscular impairments may compromise gait function in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). As such, ambulatory children with CP often use ankle foot orthosis (AFO) to facilitate and optimize their ability to walk. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the different gait indices, the Gillette Gait Index (GGI), the Gait Deviation Index (GDI), and the Gait Profile Score (GPS), reflect the improved gait that was previously shown using AFO. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 53 studies on children with spastic diplegic CP. All had undergone a comprehensive gait study and were analyzed while walking, both barefoot and with their braces, in the same session. Kinematic and temporal spatial data were determined and summarized by 3 methods: GPS, GDI, and GGI. Results: Significant differences were found between the barefoot condition and the AFO conditions for temporal and kinematic parameters: changes in GGI, GDI, and GPS were not statistically significant, with an improvement of 9.33% in GGI (P=0.448) and no change in GDI and GPS. Conclusions: The use of AFO in diplegic CP children caused a statistically significant improvement in temporal and kinematic parameters. Interestingly, it was found that this improvement was not reflected by GGI, GDI, or GPS. These findings might suggest that gait indices, as outcome measures, may sometimes not reflect all the effects of specific interventions. Level of Evidence: Level III-retrospective study.
KW - Gillette gait index
KW - ankle foot orthosis
KW - cerebral palsy
KW - gait analysis
KW - gait deviation index
KW - gait profile score
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962738276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000429
DO - 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000429
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84962738276
SN - 0271-6798
VL - 36
SP - 294
EP - 298
JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
IS - 3
ER -