TY - JOUR
T1 - Archaeal genetics - The third way
AU - Allers, Thorsten
AU - Mevarech, Moshe
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Steve Bell, John Leigh, Kevin Sowers, Ed Bolt and numerous other colleagues whose comments have improved the manuscript. We are grateful to John Leigh, Bill Metcalf, Kevin Sowers, Tadayuki Imanaka, David Walsh, Steve Bell, James Chong, Alan Majernik, Friedhelm Pfeiffer, Dieter Oesterhelt and Julie Maupin-Furlow for communicating results before publication, and to Malcolm White, Patrick Forterre, Richard Shand, Joel Querellou, Michel Gouillou, Frank Robb and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for pictures of archaeal habitats. T.A. is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship.
PY - 2005/1
Y1 - 2005/1
N2 - For decades, archaea were misclassified as bacteria because of their prokaryotic morphology. Molecular phylogeny eventually revealed that archaea, like bacteria and eukaryotes, are a fundamentally distinct domain of life. Genome analyses have confirmed that archaea share many features with eukaryotes, particularly in information processing, and therefore can serve as streamlined models for understanding eukaryotic biology. Biochemists and structural biologists have embraced the study of archaea but geneticists have been more wary, despite the fact that genetic techniques for archaea are quite sophisticated. It is time for geneticists to start asking fundamental questions about our distant relatives.
AB - For decades, archaea were misclassified as bacteria because of their prokaryotic morphology. Molecular phylogeny eventually revealed that archaea, like bacteria and eukaryotes, are a fundamentally distinct domain of life. Genome analyses have confirmed that archaea share many features with eukaryotes, particularly in information processing, and therefore can serve as streamlined models for understanding eukaryotic biology. Biochemists and structural biologists have embraced the study of archaea but geneticists have been more wary, despite the fact that genetic techniques for archaea are quite sophisticated. It is time for geneticists to start asking fundamental questions about our distant relatives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10644271631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nrg1504
DO - 10.1038/nrg1504
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:10644271631
SN - 1471-0056
VL - 6
SP - 58
EP - 73
JO - Nature Reviews Genetics
JF - Nature Reviews Genetics
IS - 1
ER -