Approximating shortest lattice vectors is not harder than approximating closest lattice vectors

O. Goldreich*, D. Micciancio, S. Safra, J. P. Seifert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Scopus citations

Abstract

We show that given oracle access to a subroutine which returns approximate closest vectors in a lattice, one may find in polynomial time approximate shortest vectors in a lattice. The level of approximation is maintained; that is, for any function f, the following holds: Suppose that the subroutine, on input of a lattice L and a target vector w (not necessarily in the lattice), outputs v qq L such that ∥v - w∥ ≤ f(n) · ∥u - w∥ for any u qq L. Then, our algorithm, on input of a lattice L, outputs a non-zero vector v qq L such that ∥v∥ ≤ f(n) · ∥u∥ for any non-zero vector u qq L. The result holds for any norm, and preserves the dimension of the lattice, i.e., the closest vector oracle is called on lattices of exactly the same dimension as the original shortest vector problem. This result establishes the widely believed conjecture by which the shortest vector problem is not harder than the closest vector problem. The proof can be easily adapted to establish an analogous result for the corresponding computational problems for linear codes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-61
Number of pages7
JournalInformation Processing Letters
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Jul 1999

Funding

FundersFunder number
Defense Advanced Research Projects AgencyDABT63-96-C-0018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Approximating shortest lattice vectors is not harder than approximating closest lattice vectors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this