TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of Linear and Nonlinear Time Series Modeling to Heart Rate Dynamics Analysis
AU - Christini, David J.
AU - Bennett, Frederick M.
AU - Lutchen, Kenneth R.
AU - Ahmed, Hassan M.
AU - Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
AU - Oriol, Nancy
N1 - Funding Information:
The application of the AR model inherently assumes that the modeled HR time series is linear. In recent years, it has been Manuscript received November 30, 1993; revised January 5, 1995. This work was supported by the Beth Israel Anesthesia Foundation and NSF Grant BCS9309426. D. J. Christini is with the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 USA and the Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215 USA. F. M. Bennett and N. Oriol are with the Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215 USA and the Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215 USA. K. R. Lutchen is with the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 USA. H. M. Ahmed is with the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 USA. J. M. Hausdorff is with the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 USA and the Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215 USA. IEEE Log Number 9409207.
PY - 1995/4
Y1 - 1995/4
N2 - The linear autoregressive (AR) model is often used to investigate the pathophysiologic mechanisms controlling heart rate (HR) dynamics. This study implemented parametric models new to this field to determine if a more appropriate HR dynamics modeling structure exists. The linear AR and autoregressive-moving average (ARMA) models, and the nonlinear polynomial autoregressive (PAR) and bilinear (BL) models were fit to instantaneous HR time series obtained from nine subjects in the supine position. Model orders were determined by the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). Model residual variance was used as the primary intermodel comparison criterion, with significance evaluated by a \2 distributed statistic. The BL model best represented the HR dynamics, as its residual variance was significantly (p < 0.05) smaller than that of the corresponding AR model for nine out of nine data sets. In all cases, the BL model had a smaller residual variance than either the ARMA or PAR models. The bilinear model was ineffective at data forecasting, however, we show that this cannot reflect BL model validity because poor prediction is inherent to the BL model structure. The apparent superiority of the nonlinear bilinear model suggests that future heart rate dynamics studies should put greater emphasis on nonlinear analyses.
AB - The linear autoregressive (AR) model is often used to investigate the pathophysiologic mechanisms controlling heart rate (HR) dynamics. This study implemented parametric models new to this field to determine if a more appropriate HR dynamics modeling structure exists. The linear AR and autoregressive-moving average (ARMA) models, and the nonlinear polynomial autoregressive (PAR) and bilinear (BL) models were fit to instantaneous HR time series obtained from nine subjects in the supine position. Model orders were determined by the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). Model residual variance was used as the primary intermodel comparison criterion, with significance evaluated by a \2 distributed statistic. The BL model best represented the HR dynamics, as its residual variance was significantly (p < 0.05) smaller than that of the corresponding AR model for nine out of nine data sets. In all cases, the BL model had a smaller residual variance than either the ARMA or PAR models. The bilinear model was ineffective at data forecasting, however, we show that this cannot reflect BL model validity because poor prediction is inherent to the BL model structure. The apparent superiority of the nonlinear bilinear model suggests that future heart rate dynamics studies should put greater emphasis on nonlinear analyses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029278173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/10.376135
DO - 10.1109/10.376135
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 7729840
AN - SCOPUS:0029278173
VL - 42
SP - 411
EP - 415
JO - IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
JF - IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
SN - 0018-9294
IS - 4
ER -