Abstract
Background: The optimal surgical approach to acute appendicitis in pregnancy remains controversial. Our aim was to compare perioperative and obstetric outcomes associated with laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a large contemporary cohort of pregnant women. Methods: Retrospective review of all women who underwent appendectomy during pregnancy in a single hospital during 2000-2014. Results: Ninety-two patients met the study criteria. Fifty (54%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 42 (46%) open appendectomy. The laparoscopy group had a lower median gestational age at surgery (16 weeks versus 24 weeks, P < .001), a shorter median hospital stay (5 days versus 3 days, P < .001), and a lower rate of postoperative complications (8% versus 24%, P = .04). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores, preterm delivery, and fetal loss. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy is safe and associated with better surgical outcomes than open appendectomy, with no difference in obstetric outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 893-897 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2016 |
Keywords
- appendectomy
- laparoscopy
- pregnancy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Appendectomy in Pregnancy: Appraisal of the Minimally Invasive Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver