TY - JOUR
T1 - Appendectomy in Pregnancy
T2 - Appraisal of the Minimally Invasive Approach
AU - Segev, Lior
AU - Segev, Yakir
AU - Rayman, Shlomi
AU - Shapiro, Ron
AU - Nissan, Aviram
AU - Sadot, Eran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016.
PY - 2016/11
Y1 - 2016/11
N2 - Background: The optimal surgical approach to acute appendicitis in pregnancy remains controversial. Our aim was to compare perioperative and obstetric outcomes associated with laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a large contemporary cohort of pregnant women. Methods: Retrospective review of all women who underwent appendectomy during pregnancy in a single hospital during 2000-2014. Results: Ninety-two patients met the study criteria. Fifty (54%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 42 (46%) open appendectomy. The laparoscopy group had a lower median gestational age at surgery (16 weeks versus 24 weeks, P < .001), a shorter median hospital stay (5 days versus 3 days, P < .001), and a lower rate of postoperative complications (8% versus 24%, P = .04). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores, preterm delivery, and fetal loss. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy is safe and associated with better surgical outcomes than open appendectomy, with no difference in obstetric outcomes.
AB - Background: The optimal surgical approach to acute appendicitis in pregnancy remains controversial. Our aim was to compare perioperative and obstetric outcomes associated with laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a large contemporary cohort of pregnant women. Methods: Retrospective review of all women who underwent appendectomy during pregnancy in a single hospital during 2000-2014. Results: Ninety-two patients met the study criteria. Fifty (54%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 42 (46%) open appendectomy. The laparoscopy group had a lower median gestational age at surgery (16 weeks versus 24 weeks, P < .001), a shorter median hospital stay (5 days versus 3 days, P < .001), and a lower rate of postoperative complications (8% versus 24%, P = .04). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores, preterm delivery, and fetal loss. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy is safe and associated with better surgical outcomes than open appendectomy, with no difference in obstetric outcomes.
KW - appendectomy
KW - laparoscopy
KW - pregnancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995378015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/lap.2016.0280
DO - 10.1089/lap.2016.0280
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 27668544
AN - SCOPUS:84995378015
SN - 1092-6429
VL - 26
SP - 893
EP - 897
JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A
JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A
IS - 11
ER -