TY - JOUR
T1 - Apical extrusion of debris by supplementary files used for retreatment
T2 - An ex vivo comparative study
AU - Pawar, Ajinkya M.
AU - Pawar, Mansing
AU - Metzger, Zvi
AU - Thakur, Bhagyashree
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Journal of Conservative Dentistry.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Aim: This study evaluated whether using supplementary files for removing root canal filling residues after ProTaper Universal Retreatment files (RFs) increased the debris extrusion apically. Materials and Methods: Eighty mandibular premolars with single root and canal were instrumented with ProTaper Universal rotary system (SX-F3) and obturated. The samples were divided randomly into four groups (n = 20). Group 1 served as a control; only ProTaper Universal RFs D1-D3 were used, and the extruded debris was weighed. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were the experimental groups, receiving a twofold retreatment protocol: Removal of the bulk, followed by the use of supplementary files. The bulk was removed by RFs, followed by the use of ProTaper NEXT (PTN), WaveOne (WO), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) for removal of the remaining root filling residues. Debris extruded apically were weighed and compared to the control group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey′s test. Results: All the three experimental groups presented significant difference (P <.01). The post hoc Tukey′s test confirmed that Group 4 (SAF) exhibited significantly less (P <.01) debris extrusion between the three groups tested. Conclusion: SAF results in less extrusion of debris when used as supplementary file to remove root-filling residues, compared to WO and PTN.
AB - Aim: This study evaluated whether using supplementary files for removing root canal filling residues after ProTaper Universal Retreatment files (RFs) increased the debris extrusion apically. Materials and Methods: Eighty mandibular premolars with single root and canal were instrumented with ProTaper Universal rotary system (SX-F3) and obturated. The samples were divided randomly into four groups (n = 20). Group 1 served as a control; only ProTaper Universal RFs D1-D3 were used, and the extruded debris was weighed. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were the experimental groups, receiving a twofold retreatment protocol: Removal of the bulk, followed by the use of supplementary files. The bulk was removed by RFs, followed by the use of ProTaper NEXT (PTN), WaveOne (WO), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) for removal of the remaining root filling residues. Debris extruded apically were weighed and compared to the control group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey′s test. Results: All the three experimental groups presented significant difference (P <.01). The post hoc Tukey′s test confirmed that Group 4 (SAF) exhibited significantly less (P <.01) debris extrusion between the three groups tested. Conclusion: SAF results in less extrusion of debris when used as supplementary file to remove root-filling residues, compared to WO and PTN.
KW - Apical debris extrusion
KW - Endodontic retreatment
KW - ProTaper NEXT (PTN)
KW - ProTaper Retreatment files (RFs)
KW - Self-Adjusting File (SAF)
KW - WaveOne (WO)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962027421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/0972-0707.178686
DO - 10.4103/0972-0707.178686
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84962027421
SN - 0972-0707
VL - 19
SP - 125
EP - 129
JO - Journal of Conservative Dentistry
JF - Journal of Conservative Dentistry
IS - 2
ER -