Abstract
Use of noninvasive tests to assess the severity of lowerextremity occlusive lesions is generally accepted. To evaluate the effectiveness of noninvasive vascular-laboratory tests in locating atherosclerotic lesions, the results of hemodynamic studies in 100 patients were reviewed by both skilled observers and a vascular computer, and compared with angiograms. The results of the comparison suggest a remarkable sensitivity of the vascular-laboratory tests in locating significant arterial obstructions, and underscore that the great predictive value of a negative result gives the physician reliable information on the patency of a given arterial segment. Computer interpretation proved less accurate than that of the vascular-laboratory personnel. (Arch Surg 1981;116:1041-1044).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1041-1044 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Archives of Surgery |
Volume | 116 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 1981 |
Externally published | Yes |