Analytic comparison of four robust algorithms for post-detection integration

N. Levanon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Four radar integration algorithms are compared with the basic moving window (video) integrator. The algorithms are robust in the sense of immunity against strong interfering spikes. Very strong spikes can appear if several radars operate in close proximity. The algorithms have been previously suggested for integration or are borrowed from CFAR thresholding methods. This paper provides an analytic performance analysis for a simple signal (Swerling II), noise and interference model. The comparison of the four algorithms, in the situation covered by this model, may be indicative of their relative performances in more realistic models, for which it is more difficult to obtain closed-form results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-72
Number of pages6
JournalIEE Proceedings, Part F: Radar and Signal Processing
Volume139
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analytic comparison of four robust algorithms for post-detection integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this