Analysis of two topotecan treatment schedules in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer

Ilan Bruchim*, Zipi Ben-Harim, Ettie Piura, Gabi Haran, Ami Fishman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two topotecan treatment schedules in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer were evaluated. Protocol A (21 days) was 1.5 mg/m2/day topotecan on days 1 through 5 of a 21-day cycle; Protocol B (weekly) 4 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Efficacy was determined by clinical exam, CT scan, and CA125 levels. Forty-three patients on Protocol A and 21 on Protocol B were evaluated. As second-line treatment, Protocol A response was 9/20 (45%). Response to Protocol B was 4/17 (23.5%; NS). As third line or more, the response on Protocols A and B together was only 3/27 (11%). High-grade haematological toxicity was reported in 12/43 (27.9%) on Protocol A and 1/21 (4.8%) on Protocol B (p = 0.04). There was no difference in progression-free-intervals between schedules in second-line treatment. The weekly protocol had lower severe haematological toxicity. Clinical response in third line or more was very low.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-134
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Chemotherapy
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy
  • Epithelial ovarian cancer
  • Topotecan

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of two topotecan treatment schedules in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this