An ironic effect of monitoring closeness

Oren Shapira*, Ayelet Gundar-Goshen, Nira Liberman, Reuven Dar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Most theories of goal pursuit underscore the beneficial consequences of monitoring progress towards goals. However, effects of affect labelling and dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness suggest that monitoring may not always facilitate goal pursuit. We predicted that in the case of pursuing interpersonal closeness, intense monitoring of progress would have a detrimental effect. We tested this hypothesis with the intimate conversation procedure, adapted from Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone, and Bator (1997). Participants in the closeness-monitoring condition asked themselves every five minutes in the course of a 45-minute interaction with a partner whether they felt any closer to their partner, whereas participants in the control condition monitored the room temperature. As predicted, intense monitoring interfered with achieving a feeling of closeness, as measured by sitting distance between pair members following the intimate conversation procedure. We discuss the possibility that monitoring would also be detrimental for achieving other goals that are internal states.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1495-1503
Number of pages9
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Keywords

  • Goals
  • Interpersonal closeness
  • Monitoring
  • Self-regulation
  • Translation dissociation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An ironic effect of monitoring closeness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this