TY - JOUR
T1 - An ironic effect of monitoring closeness
AU - Shapira, Oren
AU - Gundar-Goshen, Ayelet
AU - Liberman, Nira
AU - Dar, Reuven
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence should be addressed to: Oren Shapira, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, 5807 S, Woodlawn Avenue Chicago, IL 60637, USA. E-mail: [email protected] The reported research was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation grant no. 290/08 to Professor Nira Liberman.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Most theories of goal pursuit underscore the beneficial consequences of monitoring progress towards goals. However, effects of affect labelling and dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness suggest that monitoring may not always facilitate goal pursuit. We predicted that in the case of pursuing interpersonal closeness, intense monitoring of progress would have a detrimental effect. We tested this hypothesis with the intimate conversation procedure, adapted from Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone, and Bator (1997). Participants in the closeness-monitoring condition asked themselves every five minutes in the course of a 45-minute interaction with a partner whether they felt any closer to their partner, whereas participants in the control condition monitored the room temperature. As predicted, intense monitoring interfered with achieving a feeling of closeness, as measured by sitting distance between pair members following the intimate conversation procedure. We discuss the possibility that monitoring would also be detrimental for achieving other goals that are internal states.
AB - Most theories of goal pursuit underscore the beneficial consequences of monitoring progress towards goals. However, effects of affect labelling and dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness suggest that monitoring may not always facilitate goal pursuit. We predicted that in the case of pursuing interpersonal closeness, intense monitoring of progress would have a detrimental effect. We tested this hypothesis with the intimate conversation procedure, adapted from Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone, and Bator (1997). Participants in the closeness-monitoring condition asked themselves every five minutes in the course of a 45-minute interaction with a partner whether they felt any closer to their partner, whereas participants in the control condition monitored the room temperature. As predicted, intense monitoring interfered with achieving a feeling of closeness, as measured by sitting distance between pair members following the intimate conversation procedure. We discuss the possibility that monitoring would also be detrimental for achieving other goals that are internal states.
KW - Goals
KW - Interpersonal closeness
KW - Monitoring
KW - Self-regulation
KW - Translation dissociation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888009205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02699931.2013.794771
DO - 10.1080/02699931.2013.794771
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84888009205
SN - 0269-9931
VL - 27
SP - 1495
EP - 1503
JO - Cognition and Emotion
JF - Cognition and Emotion
IS - 8
ER -