An epileptic aristides? A neglected aspect of aristides' reception

Ido Israelowich*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Sopater, the fourth-century Greek rhetor and author of the Aristides Prolegomena, described Aelius Aristides as an epileptic. This diagnosis is particularly interesting because Sopater was intimately acquainted with Aristides' own autobiographical work - the Sacred Tales - which revolved around its author's maladies, the treatments he underwent, and his consultations with physicians, priests, and gods. Aristides himself never used the term 'epileptic' or any of its cognates. What, then, led Sopater to reach such a conclusion and how does it reflect on the reception of Aristides in late antique Athens? This paper will seek to address these questions by considering two aspects of Sopater's diagnosis. The first concerns Sopater's own understanding of the nature of epilepsy. Nearly a millennium after the Hippocratic treatise On the Sacred Disease aimed to rebuke the commonly held view that epilepsy was god-sent instead arguing that it had a nature and a cause like all other ailments, it appears that this belief was still steadfast in Sopater's day and age. The second aspect of Sopater's diagnosis to be examined concerns the implications of this understanding of Aristides as an epileptic and its relevance to the Prolegomena Sopater offered and to Aristides' reception.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-254
Number of pages18
JournalAncient Society
StatePublished - 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'An epileptic aristides? A neglected aspect of aristides' reception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this