TY - JOUR
T1 - An empirical analysis of the super-latent inhibition effect
AU - De La Casa, L. G.
AU - Lubow, R. E.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - In three conditioned taste aversion experiments, we examined the roles of several variables in producing super-latent inhibition (LI). This effect, greater LI after a long interval than after a short interval between the conditioning and the test stages (De la Casa & Lubow, 2000), was shown to increase with the number of stimulus preexposures (0, 2, or 4; Experiment 1) and with the length of the delay interval (1, 7, 14, or 21 days; Experiment 2). Furthermore, super-LI was obtained when the delay interval was introduced between the conditioning and the test stages (Experiments 1 and 2), but not when it was introduced between the preexposure and the conditioning stages (Experiment 3). The results are discussed in relation to interference explanations of LI.
AB - In three conditioned taste aversion experiments, we examined the roles of several variables in producing super-latent inhibition (LI). This effect, greater LI after a long interval than after a short interval between the conditioning and the test stages (De la Casa & Lubow, 2000), was shown to increase with the number of stimulus preexposures (0, 2, or 4; Experiment 1) and with the length of the delay interval (1, 7, 14, or 21 days; Experiment 2). Furthermore, super-LI was obtained when the delay interval was introduced between the conditioning and the test stages (Experiments 1 and 2), but not when it was introduced between the preexposure and the conditioning stages (Experiment 3). The results are discussed in relation to interference explanations of LI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036076934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/BF03192913
DO - 10.3758/BF03192913
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0036076934
SN - 0090-4996
VL - 30
SP - 112
EP - 120
JO - Animal Learning and Behavior
JF - Animal Learning and Behavior
IS - 2
ER -