Abstract
We show that a social planner who seeks to allocate a given sum in order to reduce efficiently the social stress of a population, as measured by the aggregate relative deprivation of the population, pursues a disbursement procedure that is identical to the procedure adhered to by a Rawlsian social planner who seeks to allocate the same sum in order to maximize the Rawlsian maximin-based social welfare function. Thus, the constrained minimization of aggregate relative deprivation constitutes an economics-based rationale for the philosophy-based constrained maximization of the Rawlsian social welfare function.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 179-186 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Research on Economic Inequality |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- Aggregate relative deprivation (ARD)
- An algorithm of cost-effective policy response to ARD
- Congruence of the algorithm with the Rawlsian social welfare program
- Rawlsian social welfare function
- Social stress
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An economics-based rationale for the rawlsian social welfare program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver