TY - JOUR
T1 - Allocating attention to distractor locations is based on top-down expectations
AU - Lahav, Aya
AU - Tsal, Yehoshua
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence should be addressed to Yehoshua Tsal, Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. E-mail: jehoshua@freud.tau.ac.il This research was supported by Grant 06 10714321 from the Israel Science Foundation. Part of this research was presented at the Psychonomics 52nd Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, November, 2011.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - Failures of selective attention may be explained by the attentional white bear (AWB) hypothesis maintaining that prior knowledge of distractor location causes attentional allocation to it. The AWB is demonstrated by embedding infrequent trials of two simultaneous dots among flanker trials. The dot at the expected distractor location is perceived as appearing before the dot at the expected empty location, indicating attentional allocation to expected distractor locations. A major requirement of the AWB hypothesis is that it occurs in a top-down manner due to expectations. We devised a variation of the original AWB experiment, which enabled us to differentiate between the top-down and bottom-up contributions. The results show that top-down expectancies, which are a critical part of the AWB characterization, occur independently of bottom-up contributions.
AB - Failures of selective attention may be explained by the attentional white bear (AWB) hypothesis maintaining that prior knowledge of distractor location causes attentional allocation to it. The AWB is demonstrated by embedding infrequent trials of two simultaneous dots among flanker trials. The dot at the expected distractor location is perceived as appearing before the dot at the expected empty location, indicating attentional allocation to expected distractor locations. A major requirement of the AWB hypothesis is that it occurs in a top-down manner due to expectations. We devised a variation of the original AWB experiment, which enabled us to differentiate between the top-down and bottom-up contributions. The results show that top-down expectancies, which are a critical part of the AWB characterization, occur independently of bottom-up contributions.
KW - Attentional white bear
KW - Distractor processing
KW - Flanker task
KW - Selective attention
KW - Visual attention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884284164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2013.768276
DO - 10.1080/17470218.2013.768276
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84884284164
SN - 1747-0218
VL - 66
SP - 1873
EP - 1880
JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
IS - 9
ER -