Activity in primary motor cortex during action observation covaries with subsequent behavioral changes in execution

Nadav Aridan, Roy Mukamel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Observing someone else perform a movement facilitates motor planning, execution, and motor memory formation. Rate, an important feature in the execution of repeated movements, has been shown to vary following movement observation although the underlying neural mechanisms are unclear. In the current study, we examined how the rate of self-paced index finger pressing is implicitly modified following passive observation of a similar action performed at a different rate. Methods: Fifty subjects performed a finger pressing sequence with their right hand at their own pace before and after passive observation of either a 1-min video depicting the task performed at 3 Hz by someone else or a black screen. An additional set of 15 subjects performed the task in an MRI scanner. Results: Across all 50 subjects, the spontaneous execution rate prior to video observation had a bimodal distribution with modes around 2 and 4 Hz. Following video observation, the slower subjects performed the task at an increased rate. In the 15 subjects who performed the task in the MRI scanner, we found positive correlation between fMRI signal in the left primary motor strip during passive video observation and subsequent behavioral changes in task performance rate. Conclusion: We conclude that observing someone else perform an action at a higher rate implicitly increases the spontaneous rate of execution, and that this implicit induction is mediated by activity in the contralateral primary motor cortex.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere00550
JournalBrain and Behavior
Volume6
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • imitation
  • mirror neurons
  • motor system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Activity in primary motor cortex during action observation covaries with subsequent behavioral changes in execution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this