TY - JOUR
T1 - Activation of lymphocytes by BAT and anti CTLA-4
T2 - Comparison of binding to T and B cells
AU - Raiter, Annat
AU - Novogrodsky, Abraham
AU - Hardy, Britta
PY - 1999/8/3
Y1 - 1999/8/3
N2 - In this study we compare the binding and immune stimulatory properties of BAT and anti CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Both antibodies were previously shown to manifest effective immune responses against tumor cells. We have described that BAT antibody, produced against Daudi, a B lymphoblastoid cell line, binds and activates T cells. In this paper we demonstrate that anti CTLA-4, produced against the T-cell activation determinant CTLA-4, binds also to B lymphoblastoid cell lines like Daudi and Raji. Both antibodies do not bind resting B cells. BAT binds resting T lymphocytes as well as activated T lymphocytes, whereas anti CTLA-4 binds only activated T cells. Competitive binding experiments indicate that the binding sites of BAT and anti CTLA-4 on activated T cells are distinct. We have studied the in vitro stimulatory effect of BAT and anti CTLA-4 on lymphocytes cultured with or without tumor cells. In contrast to BAT that increased the proliferation of lymphocytes that have been cultured with tumor cells, anti CTLA-4 did not synergize with tumor cells to enhance lymphocyte proliferation.
AB - In this study we compare the binding and immune stimulatory properties of BAT and anti CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Both antibodies were previously shown to manifest effective immune responses against tumor cells. We have described that BAT antibody, produced against Daudi, a B lymphoblastoid cell line, binds and activates T cells. In this paper we demonstrate that anti CTLA-4, produced against the T-cell activation determinant CTLA-4, binds also to B lymphoblastoid cell lines like Daudi and Raji. Both antibodies do not bind resting B cells. BAT binds resting T lymphocytes as well as activated T lymphocytes, whereas anti CTLA-4 binds only activated T cells. Competitive binding experiments indicate that the binding sites of BAT and anti CTLA-4 on activated T cells are distinct. We have studied the in vitro stimulatory effect of BAT and anti CTLA-4 on lymphocytes cultured with or without tumor cells. In contrast to BAT that increased the proliferation of lymphocytes that have been cultured with tumor cells, anti CTLA-4 did not synergize with tumor cells to enhance lymphocyte proliferation.
KW - Anti CTLA-4
KW - BAT monoclonal antibody
KW - Lymphocyte activation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033520036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0165-2478(99)00081-4
DO - 10.1016/S0165-2478(99)00081-4
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 10482359
AN - SCOPUS:0033520036
SN - 0165-2478
VL - 69
SP - 247
EP - 251
JO - Immunology Letters
JF - Immunology Letters
IS - 2
ER -