Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Acromegaly Disease Control Maintained After Switching From Injected Somatostatin Receptor Ligands to Oral Paltusotine

  • Mônica R. Gadelha*
  • , Alessandra Casagrande
  • , Christian J. Strasburger
  • , Martin Bidlingmaier
  • , Peter J. Snyder
  • , Mirtha A. Guitelman
  • , Cesar L. Boguszewski
  • , Michael Buchfelder
  • , Ilan Shimon
  • , Gerald Raverot
  • , Miklós Tóth
  • , Emese Mezősi
  • , Mirjana Doknic
  • , Xiaolin Fan
  • , David Clemmons
  • , Peter J. Trainer
  • , R. Scott Struthers
  • , Alan Krasner
  • , Beverly M.K. Biller
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • El Hospital General de Agudos Carlos G. Durand
  • Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • Rabin Medical Center Israel
  • Hospices civils de Lyon
  • Semmelweis University
  • University of Pecs
  • Clinical Center of Serbia
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context. Paltusotine is a nonpeptide selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paltusotine in the treatment of patients with acromegaly previously controlled with injected somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). Methods. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled adults with acromegaly who had IGF-I 1.0 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) while receiving a stable dose of depot octreotide or lanreotide. Patients were switched from injected SRLs and randomized to receive paltusotine or placebo orally for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining IGF-I 1.0× ULN. Secondary endpoints were change in IGF-I level, change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary score, and maintenance of mean 5-sample GH 1.0 ng/mL. Results. The primary endpoint was met: 83.3% (25/30) of patients receiving paltusotine and 3.6% (1/28) receiving placebo maintained IGF-I 1.0× ULN (odds ratio, 126.53; 95% CI, 13.73-999.99; P .0001). Paltusotine was also superior to placebo for all secondary endpoints: mean (± SE) change in IGF-I of 0.04 ± 0.09× ULN vs 0.83 ± 0.1× ULN (P .0001); mean (± SE) change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary score of −0.6 ± 1.5 vs 4.6 ± 1.6 (P = .02); mean GH maintained at <1.0 ng/mL in 20/23 (87.0%) vs 5/18 (27.8%) patients (odds ratio, 16.61; 95% CI, 2.86-181.36; P = .0003). The most common adverse events were acromegaly symptoms and gastrointestinal effects characteristic of SRLs. Conclusion. Replacement of injected SRLs by once-daily oral paltusotine was effective in maintaining both biochemical and symptom control in patients with acromegaly and was well tolerated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-237
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume110
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025

Funding

Funders
Nancy Holland
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    Keywords

    • IGF-I
    • acromegaly
    • clinical trial
    • paltusotine
    • somatostatin
    • somatostatin receptor 2

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Acromegaly Disease Control Maintained After Switching From Injected Somatostatin Receptor Ligands to Oral Paltusotine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this