Abstract
Male and female college students, divided according to levels of achievement motivation, were asked to do an anagram task at which their success or failure was determined by experimental manipulation of the problems they were given. Their ratings of ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck as possible causes for success or failure indicated that those with high achievement motivation of both sexes made relatively higher ratings for ability and lower ratings for task difficulty. Females tended to employ higher ratings for luck, and females with high achievement motivation made maximal use of effort as a causal factor. Theoretical implications and potential applications of these data are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 301-313 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Sex Roles |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1977 |
Externally published | Yes |