Acamprosate and baclofen were not effective in the treatment of pathological gambling: Preliminary blind rater comparison study

Pinhas N. Dannon*, Oded Rosenberg, Netta Schoenfeld, Moshe Kotler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Pathological gambling (PG) is a highly prevalent and disabling impulse control disorder. A range of psychopharmacological options are available for the treatment of PG, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, opioid receptor antagonists, anti-addiction drugs, and mood stabilizers. In our preliminary study, we examined the efficacy of two anti-addiction drugs, baclofen and acamprosate, in the treatment of PG. Materials and Methods: Seventeen male gamblers were randomly divided into two groups. Each group received one of the two drugs without being blind to treatment. All patients underwent a comprehensive psychiatric diagnostic evaluation and completed a series of semi-structured interviews. During the 6-months of study, monthly evaluations were carried out to assess improvement and relapses. Relapse was defined as recurrent gambling behavior. Results: None of the 17 patients reached the 6-months abstinence. One patient receiving baclofen sustained abstinence for 4 months. Fourteen patients succeeded in sustaining abstinence for 1-3 months. Two patients stopped attending monthly evaluations. Conclusion: Baclofen and acamprosate did not prove efficient in treating pathological gamblers.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle 33
JournalFrontiers in Psychiatry
Volume2
Issue numberJUN
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Acamprosate
  • Baclofen
  • Behavioral addiction
  • GABA
  • Pathological gambling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acamprosate and baclofen were not effective in the treatment of pathological gambling: Preliminary blind rater comparison study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this