Abstract Thinking Facilitates Aggregation of Information

Britt Hadar*, Moshe Glickman*, Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman, Marius Usher

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Many situations in life (such as considering which stock to invest in, or which people to befriend) require averaging across series of values. Here, we examined predictions derived from construal level theory, and tested whether abstract compared with concrete thinking facilitates the process of aggregating values into a unified summary representation. In four experiments, participants were induced to think more abstractly (vs. concretely) and performed different variations of an averaging task with numerical values (Experiments 1–2 and 4), and emotional faces (Experiment 3). We found that the induction of abstract, compared with concrete thinking, improved aggregation accuracy (Experiments 1–3), but did not improve memory for specific items (Experiment 4).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1733-1743
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2022


FundersFunder number
United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation524/17, 2016090
Israel Science Foundation1413/17


    • Abstraction
    • Construal level theory
    • Emotion perception
    • Numerical averaging


    Dive into the research topics of 'Abstract Thinking Facilitates Aggregation of Information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this