Abstract
Solving goals - Like deciding word problems or resolving constraints - Is much easier in some theory presentations than in others. What have been called "completion processes", in particular in the study of equational logic, involve finding appropriate presentations of a given theory to solve easily a given class of problems. We provide a general proof-theoretic setting within which completion-like processes can be modelled and studied. This framework centers around well-founded orderings of proofs. It allows for abstract definitions and very general characterizations of saturation processes and redundancy criteria.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 65-74 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Proceedings - Symposium on Logic in Computer Science |
State | Published - 2003 |
Event | 18th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science - Ottawa, Ont., Canada Duration: 22 Jun 2003 → 25 Jun 2003 |