TY - JOUR
T1 - Abolition of the acquisition but not the expression of latent inhibition by chlordiazepoxide in rats
AU - Feldon, J.
AU - Weiner, I.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from the Israeli Ministry of Health, Chief Scientist's Office to J. Feldon and I. Weiner. We thank Ms. Daphna Henig for helping to conduct the experiment and Ms. Paula van der Werff for excellent typing of the manuscript.
PY - 1989/1
Y1 - 1989/1
N2 - In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, prior nonreinforced exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects learning not to attend to, or ignore, stimuli which predict no significant consequences. The present experiment tested the effects of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on LI using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages given 24 hr apart: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Preexposure and conditioning were given off-baseline. CDP (5 mg/kg) was administered only in preexposure, only in conditioning, in both stages or in neither. The administration of the drug during tone-shock conditioning conducted off-baseline markedly reduced animals' suppression to the tone in a subsequent licking test which was conducted without the drug. The administration of CDP during nonreinforced preexposure to the tone abolished the development of LI, i.e., drug-treated preexposed animals did not show reduced suppression as compared to drug-treated nonpreexposed animals. These results demonstrate that CDP: a) blocks the acquisition of classically conditioned fear and b) disrupts animals' ability to learn that stimuli predict no significant outcomes.
AB - In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, prior nonreinforced exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects learning not to attend to, or ignore, stimuli which predict no significant consequences. The present experiment tested the effects of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on LI using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages given 24 hr apart: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Preexposure and conditioning were given off-baseline. CDP (5 mg/kg) was administered only in preexposure, only in conditioning, in both stages or in neither. The administration of the drug during tone-shock conditioning conducted off-baseline markedly reduced animals' suppression to the tone in a subsequent licking test which was conducted without the drug. The administration of CDP during nonreinforced preexposure to the tone abolished the development of LI, i.e., drug-treated preexposed animals did not show reduced suppression as compared to drug-treated nonpreexposed animals. These results demonstrate that CDP: a) blocks the acquisition of classically conditioned fear and b) disrupts animals' ability to learn that stimuli predict no significant outcomes.
KW - Chlordiazepoxide
KW - Latent inhibition
KW - Off-baseline conditioned suppression
KW - Rat
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0024508699
U2 - 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90220-7
DO - 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90220-7
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0024508699
SN - 0091-3057
VL - 32
SP - 123
EP - 127
JO - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
JF - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
IS - 1
ER -