TY - JOUR
T1 - A text-based analysis of non-narrative texts
AU - Giora, Rachel
PY - 1985
Y1 - 1985
N2 - Most linguistic theories are concerned with the rendering explicit of what ordinary speakers find intuitively acceptable. Specifically, a linguistic theory is to provide rules for sentence well-formedness. A step forward is taken by recent researchers into text well-formedness. The conditions for text well-formedness can be viewed as requirements on either the surface structure or the semantic organization of the text. This study is a research into the constraints on the semantic structure of the text. In this study text well-formedness is defined in terms of the Relevance Requirement. On this view, a text is well-formed if all its main assertion propositions are relevant to a Topic of Discourse (DT). Thus, Relevance is viewed as a relation between a proposition or a set of propositions and a DT. To be able to account for text well-formedness, then, it is necessary to make explicit the notions of Relevance and DT. My suggestion here is to explicate the above notions in cognitive terms. Specifically, I propose here the application of categorical organization (in the sense established by Rosch) to non-narrative texts. Such texts, I argue, get organized in the way categorial concepts are formed.
AB - Most linguistic theories are concerned with the rendering explicit of what ordinary speakers find intuitively acceptable. Specifically, a linguistic theory is to provide rules for sentence well-formedness. A step forward is taken by recent researchers into text well-formedness. The conditions for text well-formedness can be viewed as requirements on either the surface structure or the semantic organization of the text. This study is a research into the constraints on the semantic structure of the text. In this study text well-formedness is defined in terms of the Relevance Requirement. On this view, a text is well-formed if all its main assertion propositions are relevant to a Topic of Discourse (DT). Thus, Relevance is viewed as a relation between a proposition or a set of propositions and a DT. To be able to account for text well-formedness, then, it is necessary to make explicit the notions of Relevance and DT. My suggestion here is to explicate the above notions in cognitive terms. Specifically, I propose here the application of categorical organization (in the sense established by Rosch) to non-narrative texts. Such texts, I argue, get organized in the way categorial concepts are formed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928221667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/thli.1985.12.s1.115
DO - 10.1515/thli.1985.12.s1.115
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84928221667
SN - 0301-4428
VL - 12
SP - 115
EP - 136
JO - Theoretical Linguistics
JF - Theoretical Linguistics
IS - 2-3
ER -