TY - JOUR
T1 - A tale of a threshing machine
T2 - Images of the Voigt-Leibniz mathematical-agricultural machine at the beginning of the 18th century
AU - Friedman, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - This paper examines how a certain threshing machine was developed and improved by Jobst Heinrich Voigt and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz between 1699 and 1700. While this machine was based on various mechanical principles and instruments, including the pinned drum mechanism first noted by Georg Philipp Harsdörffer, it was later reconceptualized as a ‘mathematical’ machine. I claim that such a positioning was not unique to this machine, but part of a wider movement during the 18th century that considered various artisanal instruments as mathematical, as well as agricultural and artisanal knowledge as scientific. Examining the development and subsequent reception of this machine, I show that during the first decades of the 18th century these conceptions gave rise to a double image of this machine, and hence of agricultural knowledge in general: on the one hand, this machine was considered as more efficient and productive (while still in need of improvement); on the other hand, it was viewed, either implicitly or explicitly, as something that should be studied by mathematicians, thus reflecting a changing image of mathematics.
AB - This paper examines how a certain threshing machine was developed and improved by Jobst Heinrich Voigt and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz between 1699 and 1700. While this machine was based on various mechanical principles and instruments, including the pinned drum mechanism first noted by Georg Philipp Harsdörffer, it was later reconceptualized as a ‘mathematical’ machine. I claim that such a positioning was not unique to this machine, but part of a wider movement during the 18th century that considered various artisanal instruments as mathematical, as well as agricultural and artisanal knowledge as scientific. Examining the development and subsequent reception of this machine, I show that during the first decades of the 18th century these conceptions gave rise to a double image of this machine, and hence of agricultural knowledge in general: on the one hand, this machine was considered as more efficient and productive (while still in need of improvement); on the other hand, it was viewed, either implicitly or explicitly, as something that should be studied by mathematicians, thus reflecting a changing image of mathematics.
KW - Economic and agricultural enlightenment
KW - Leibniz
KW - Mathematization of agricultural instruments
KW - Pinned drums
KW - Threshing machine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190246881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.01.005
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38626701
AN - SCOPUS:85190246881
SN - 0039-3681
VL - 105
SP - 17
EP - 31
JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
ER -