TY - JOUR
T1 - A tailored phase I-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey to capture the patient experience of symptomatic adverse events
AU - Janse van Rensburg, Helena J.
AU - Liu, Zhihui
AU - Watson, Geoffrey A.
AU - Veitch, Zachary W.
AU - Shepshelovich, Daniel
AU - Spreafico, Anna
AU - Abdul Razak, Albiruni R.
AU - Bedard, Philippe L.
AU - Siu, Lillian L.
AU - Minasian, Lori
AU - Hansen, Aaron R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/9/7
Y1 - 2023/9/7
N2 - Background: Patient perspectives are fundamental to defining tolerability of investigational anti-neoplastic therapies in clinical trials. Phase I trials present a unique challenge in designing tools for efficiently collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) given the difficulty of anticipating adverse events of relevance. However, phase I trials also offer an opportunity for investigators to optimize drug dosing based on tolerability for future larger-scale trials and in eventual clinical practice. Existing tools for comprehensively capturing PROs are generally cumbersome and are not routinely used in phase I trials. Methods: Here, we describe the creation of a tailored survey based on the National Cancer Institute’s PRO-CTCAE for collecting patients’ perspectives on symptomatic adverse events in phase I trials in oncology. Results: We describe our stepwise approach to condensing the original 78-symptom library into a modified 30 term core list of symptoms which can be efficiently applied. We further show that our tailored survey aligns with phase I trialists’ perspectives on symptoms of relevance. Conclusions: This tailored survey represents the first PRO tool developed specifically for assessing tolerability in the phase I oncology population. We provide recommendations for future work aimed at integrating this survey into clinical practice.
AB - Background: Patient perspectives are fundamental to defining tolerability of investigational anti-neoplastic therapies in clinical trials. Phase I trials present a unique challenge in designing tools for efficiently collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) given the difficulty of anticipating adverse events of relevance. However, phase I trials also offer an opportunity for investigators to optimize drug dosing based on tolerability for future larger-scale trials and in eventual clinical practice. Existing tools for comprehensively capturing PROs are generally cumbersome and are not routinely used in phase I trials. Methods: Here, we describe the creation of a tailored survey based on the National Cancer Institute’s PRO-CTCAE for collecting patients’ perspectives on symptomatic adverse events in phase I trials in oncology. Results: We describe our stepwise approach to condensing the original 78-symptom library into a modified 30 term core list of symptoms which can be efficiently applied. We further show that our tailored survey aligns with phase I trialists’ perspectives on symptoms of relevance. Conclusions: This tailored survey represents the first PRO tool developed specifically for assessing tolerability in the phase I oncology population. We provide recommendations for future work aimed at integrating this survey into clinical practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164184085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-023-02307-w
DO - 10.1038/s41416-023-02307-w
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 37419999
AN - SCOPUS:85164184085
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 129
SP - 612
EP - 619
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 4
ER -