A Reform Less Ordinary? Historical Institutionalism, Punctuated Equilibrium, and Mental Health Care Privatization

Amos Zehavi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Theories of policy and institutional reform are of major interest to numerous disciplines in the social sciences. The main question motivating this study is under what circumstances is dramatic reform possible. It is argued that theories of reform formulated within two central heuristic frameworks-historical institutionalism and punctuated equilibrium-fail to satisfactorily explain reform dynamics in small policy domains, which are characterized by having program constituencies with little political clout. In small policy domains, dramatic reform is facilitated by the political weakness of the opposition. Policy makers are able to pursue reform successfully in small domains without resorting to obfuscation strategies or reliance on slow-moving institutional mechanisms. This argument is illustrated in a study of mental health care privatization in two American states: Massachusetts and Texas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)731-753
Number of pages23
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Keywords

  • historical institutionalism
  • mental health care
  • path dependency
  • privatization
  • punctuated equilibrium

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Reform Less Ordinary? Historical Institutionalism, Punctuated Equilibrium, and Mental Health Care Privatization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this