TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized controlled trial of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in modified natural cycle–frozen embryo transfer
AU - Horowitz, Eran
AU - Mizrachi, Yossi
AU - Finkelstein, Maya
AU - Farhi, Jacob
AU - Shalev, Amir
AU - Gold, Eran
AU - Raziel, Arieh
AU - Weissman, Ariel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objective: Our aim was to study whether luteal phase support (LPS) increases the live-birth rate (LBR) in women undergoing modified natural cycle (mNC) frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center, a total of 59 patients aged 18–45 years, underwent mNC-FET. FET was performed in mNC following ovulation triggering by hCG. Patients were randomized into two groups; The No-LPS Group included 28 women who did not receive LPS, and the LPS Group included 31 women who received vaginal progesterone for LPS. The main outcome measure was LBR. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The no-LPS group and the LPS group did not differ with regard to clinical pregnancy rate (21.4% vs. 32.3%; respectively, p =.35), LBR (17.9% vs. 19.4%; respectively, p =.88), or spontaneous miscarriage rate (3.6% vs. 12.9%; respectively, p =.35). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, LPS was not associated with LBR after controlling for confounders. Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that LPS after mNC-FET does not improve the reproductive outcome, and therefore, might not be necessary.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01483365.
AB - Objective: Our aim was to study whether luteal phase support (LPS) increases the live-birth rate (LBR) in women undergoing modified natural cycle (mNC) frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center, a total of 59 patients aged 18–45 years, underwent mNC-FET. FET was performed in mNC following ovulation triggering by hCG. Patients were randomized into two groups; The No-LPS Group included 28 women who did not receive LPS, and the LPS Group included 31 women who received vaginal progesterone for LPS. The main outcome measure was LBR. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The no-LPS group and the LPS group did not differ with regard to clinical pregnancy rate (21.4% vs. 32.3%; respectively, p =.35), LBR (17.9% vs. 19.4%; respectively, p =.88), or spontaneous miscarriage rate (3.6% vs. 12.9%; respectively, p =.35). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, LPS was not associated with LBR after controlling for confounders. Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that LPS after mNC-FET does not improve the reproductive outcome, and therefore, might not be necessary.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01483365.
KW - ART
KW - Frozen embryo transfer
KW - RCT
KW - luteal phase support
KW - modified natural cycle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106823858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09513590.2020.1854717
DO - 10.1080/09513590.2020.1854717
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33307906
AN - SCOPUS:85106823858
SN - 0951-3590
VL - 37
SP - 792
EP - 797
JO - Gynecological Endocrinology
JF - Gynecological Endocrinology
IS - 9
ER -