TY - JOUR
T1 - A new procedure for removal of a "lost" intrauterine device
AU - Ben-Rafael, Zion
AU - Bider, David
PY - 1996/5
Y1 - 1996/5
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of removal of a "lost" intrauterine device (IUD) with the use of a cylindrical brush. Methods: Women aged 25-43 years with so-called "lost" IUD, in whom the string was indiscernible, were enrolled in the study. During gynecologic examination, a cylindrical brush was rotated in the cervical canal until the device was extracted by a rotating motion. No antibiotics were used after removal of the IUD with the cylindrical brush. Results: Twenty-seven women whose IUD could not be removed from the uterine cavity because of an indiscernible string were referred for a trial of IUD removal. All patients had used a plastic, copper-releasing IUD. Before admission, they had undergone an attempt at IUD removal by their physician using either a hook or clamp. In 24 patients who were referred to our center, the IUD was removed by using a cylindrical brush to view the string. The IUD was removed by hysteroscopy in three cases, in two of which no string was found. Conclusion: A cylindrical brush can be used safely as an adjunct to remove an IUD and is a simple method that may be performed before another invasive procedure is attempted. (Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:785-6).
AB - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of removal of a "lost" intrauterine device (IUD) with the use of a cylindrical brush. Methods: Women aged 25-43 years with so-called "lost" IUD, in whom the string was indiscernible, were enrolled in the study. During gynecologic examination, a cylindrical brush was rotated in the cervical canal until the device was extracted by a rotating motion. No antibiotics were used after removal of the IUD with the cylindrical brush. Results: Twenty-seven women whose IUD could not be removed from the uterine cavity because of an indiscernible string were referred for a trial of IUD removal. All patients had used a plastic, copper-releasing IUD. Before admission, they had undergone an attempt at IUD removal by their physician using either a hook or clamp. In 24 patients who were referred to our center, the IUD was removed by using a cylindrical brush to view the string. The IUD was removed by hysteroscopy in three cases, in two of which no string was found. Conclusion: A cylindrical brush can be used safely as an adjunct to remove an IUD and is a simple method that may be performed before another invasive procedure is attempted. (Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:785-6).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030008260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00009-9
DO - 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00009-9
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0030008260
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 87
SP - 785
EP - 786
JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 5 I
ER -