A game theoretic approach reveals that discretizing clinical information can reduce antibiotic misuse

Maya Diamant, Shoham Baruch, Eias Kassem, Khitam Muhsen, Dov Samet, Moshe Leshno, Uri Obolski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The overuse of antibiotics is exacerbating the antibiotic resistance crisis. Since this problem is a classic common-goods dilemma, it naturally lends itself to a game-theoretic analysis. Hence, we designed a model wherein physicians weigh whether antibiotics should be prescribed, given that antibiotic usage depletes its future effectiveness. The physicians’ decisions rely on the probability of a bacterial infection before definitive laboratory results are available. We show that the physicians’ equilibrium decision rule of antibiotic prescription is not socially optimal. However, we prove that discretizing the information provided to physicians can mitigate the gap between their equilibrium decisions and the social optimum of antibiotic prescription. Despite this problem’s complexity, the effectiveness of the discretization solely depends on the type of information available to the physician to determine the nature of infection. This is demonstrated on theoretic distributions and a clinical dataset. Our results provide a game-theory based guide for optimal output of current and future decision support systems of antibiotic prescription.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1148
JournalNature Communications
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 19 Feb 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A game theoretic approach reveals that discretizing clinical information can reduce antibiotic misuse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this