Abstract
A striking feature of Cappelen and Lepore's Davidsonian theory of quotation is the range of the overlooked data to which it offers an elegant semantical analysis. Recently, François Recanati argued for a pragmatic account of quotation, on the basis of new data that Cappelen and Lepore overlooked. In this article I expose what seem to me the weak points in Recanati's alternative approach, and show how proponents of the demonstrative theory can account for the data on which Recanati bases his theory.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 534-547 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Mind and Language |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2004 |
Externally published | Yes |