Abstract
Historically, journalism as a profession emerged alongside the notion of objectivity. However, in the past decades, objectivity has been dismissed not only as an unattainable standard but also as an undesirable norm. Yet an analysis of the criticisms reveals that most scholars actually fail to define journalistic objectivity. This article tries to remedy this flaw and to suggest that journalistic objectivity is an evolving notion which can nolonger be considered a synonym for neutrality or detachment. Objectivity is a standard that promotes truth, defined as a 'correspondence, grounded in correctness, between thought and reality' (Heidegger, 1943:1). Unlike alternative standards which are centered on personal moral values, objectivity conceives of journalism as a performance, with this term referring to three interrelated dimensions: the essential notion of practice, the existence of concrete and universal criteria of evaluation, and the openness to criticisms.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 385-398 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Media, Culture and Society |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- journalistic objectivity
- journalistic practices
- journalistic values
- performance
- professionalism
- truth