TY - JOUR
T1 - A deep-learning method for the denoising of ultra-low dose chest CT in coronary artery calcium score evaluation
AU - Klug, M.
AU - Shemesh, J.
AU - Green, M.
AU - Mayer, A.
AU - Kerpel, A.
AU - Konen, E.
AU - Marom, E. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Royal College of Radiologists
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Aim: To evaluate a novel deep-learning denoising method for ultra-low dose CT (ULDCT) in the assessment of coronary artery calcium score (CACS). Materials and methods: Sixty adult patients who underwent two unenhanced chest CT examinations, a normal dose CT (NDCT) and an ULDCT, were enrolled prospectively between September 2017 to December 201. A special training set was created to learn the characteristics of the real noise affecting the ULDCT implementing a fully convolutional neural network with batch normalisation. Subsequently, the 60 ULDCTs of the evaluation set were denoised. Two blinded radiologists assessed the NDCT, ULDCT, and denoised-ULDCT (DULDCT), assigning a CACS and categorised each scan as having a score above or below 100 and presence of calcifications (score 0 versus >0). Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between the readers and differences in CACSs between each imaging method. Results: After excluding one patient, the cohort included 59 patients (median age 67 years, 58% men). The ULDCT median effective radiation dose (ERD) was 0.172 mSv, which was 2.8% of the NDCT median ERD. Denoising improved the signal-to-noise ratio by 27.7% (p<0.001). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect between readers (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.993). CACSs were lower for ULDCT and DULDCT as compared to the NDCT (p ≤ 0.001). In differentiating between the presence and absence of coronary artery calcifications, DULDCT showed greater accuracy (98–100%) and positive likelihood ratio (14.29–>99) compared to ULDCT (92% and 2.78, respectively). Conclusion: DULCT significantly reduced the image noise and better identified patients with no coronary artery calcifications than native ULDCT.
AB - Aim: To evaluate a novel deep-learning denoising method for ultra-low dose CT (ULDCT) in the assessment of coronary artery calcium score (CACS). Materials and methods: Sixty adult patients who underwent two unenhanced chest CT examinations, a normal dose CT (NDCT) and an ULDCT, were enrolled prospectively between September 2017 to December 201. A special training set was created to learn the characteristics of the real noise affecting the ULDCT implementing a fully convolutional neural network with batch normalisation. Subsequently, the 60 ULDCTs of the evaluation set were denoised. Two blinded radiologists assessed the NDCT, ULDCT, and denoised-ULDCT (DULDCT), assigning a CACS and categorised each scan as having a score above or below 100 and presence of calcifications (score 0 versus >0). Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between the readers and differences in CACSs between each imaging method. Results: After excluding one patient, the cohort included 59 patients (median age 67 years, 58% men). The ULDCT median effective radiation dose (ERD) was 0.172 mSv, which was 2.8% of the NDCT median ERD. Denoising improved the signal-to-noise ratio by 27.7% (p<0.001). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect between readers (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.993). CACSs were lower for ULDCT and DULDCT as compared to the NDCT (p ≤ 0.001). In differentiating between the presence and absence of coronary artery calcifications, DULDCT showed greater accuracy (98–100%) and positive likelihood ratio (14.29–>99) compared to ULDCT (92% and 2.78, respectively). Conclusion: DULCT significantly reduced the image noise and better identified patients with no coronary artery calcifications than native ULDCT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127894473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2022.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2022.03.005
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 35414431
AN - SCOPUS:85127894473
SN - 0009-9260
VL - 77
SP - e509-e517
JO - Clinical Radiology
JF - Clinical Radiology
IS - 7
ER -