TY - JOUR
T1 - A contextual analysis of the impact of managerial expectations on asymmetric cost behavior
AU - Chen, Jason V.
AU - Kama, Itay
AU - Lehavy, Reuven
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - We examine the effect of managerial expectations on asymmetric cost behavior in the context of resource adjustment costs and unused resource constraints. Our results show that the incremental impact of managerial expectations on cost asymmetry is the strongest when adjustment costs and unused resources are high. Conversely, when both are low, expectations have no impact on the degree of cost asymmetry. Furthermore, when the degree of unused resources is high, managerial pessimism is associated with anti-sticky cost behavior but managerial optimism reverses this relation and results in cost stickiness. Finally, we find the strongest cost stickiness under the following: a low degree of unused resources, a high magnitude of adjustment costs, and optimistic managerial expectations; by contrast, the strongest cost anti-stickiness occurs when all three drivers operate in the opposite direction. Our study suggests that additional economic determinants should be considered when assessing the impact of managerial expectations on cost behavior.
AB - We examine the effect of managerial expectations on asymmetric cost behavior in the context of resource adjustment costs and unused resource constraints. Our results show that the incremental impact of managerial expectations on cost asymmetry is the strongest when adjustment costs and unused resources are high. Conversely, when both are low, expectations have no impact on the degree of cost asymmetry. Furthermore, when the degree of unused resources is high, managerial pessimism is associated with anti-sticky cost behavior but managerial optimism reverses this relation and results in cost stickiness. Finally, we find the strongest cost stickiness under the following: a low degree of unused resources, a high magnitude of adjustment costs, and optimistic managerial expectations; by contrast, the strongest cost anti-stickiness occurs when all three drivers operate in the opposite direction. Our study suggests that additional economic determinants should be considered when assessing the impact of managerial expectations on cost behavior.
KW - Adjustment costs
KW - Cost anti-stickiness
KW - Cost asymmetry
KW - Cost stickiness
KW - Forward-looking statements
KW - Managerial decisions
KW - Managerial expectations
KW - Unused resources
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065162863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11142-019-09491-2
DO - 10.1007/s11142-019-09491-2
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85065162863
SN - 1380-6653
VL - 24
SP - 665
EP - 693
JO - Review of Accounting Studies
JF - Review of Accounting Studies
IS - 2
ER -