TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison between 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for excluding regional metastases prior to radical prostatectomy
AU - Frumer, Michael
AU - Milk, Nadav
AU - Rinott Mizrahi, Gal
AU - Bistritzky, Sergiu
AU - Sternberg, Itay
AU - Leibovitch, Ilan
AU - Dekel, Yoram
AU - Amiel, Gilad E.
AU - Zisman, Amnon
AU - Baniel, Jack
AU - Haifler, Miki
AU - Gal, Jonathan
AU - Hoffman, Azik
AU - Sagy, Itay
AU - Rosenzweig, Barak
AU - Haramaty, Rennen
AU - Golan, Shay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Objectives: To compare the ability of 68Ga -PSMA PET/CT (PSMA PET/CT) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to exclude lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: A multicenter cohort of patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI prior to RP with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) was analyzed. Increased Ga68-PSMA uptake on PET/CT and enlarged (> 10 mm) or abnormal lymph nodes on mpMRI were considered positive findings. The final surgical pathology served as the standard of reference. The negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated for each modality separately, as well as the combined value. Results: Included were 89 patients with D’Amico intermediate (45%) or high-risk (55%) prostate cancer. The median number of extracted LN was 9 (IQR 6-14). LNI was found in 12 (13.5%) patients. The NPV of mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT, and the two tests combined were 87%, 89%, and 90%, in the entire cohort, 95%, 97%, and 97% in patients with intermediate-risk disease, and 80%, 82%, and 83% in patients with high-risk disease, respectively. The median diameter of LN missed by both imaging and the median intranodal tumor diameter was 5.5 (IQR 3–10) mm and 1 (IQR 1–3) mm, respectively. Conclusions: PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrated similar performance in excluding pelvic LNI with NPV of approximately 90%. The combination of both tests does not improve NPV significantly. Therefore, even in the era of advanced imaging, PLND is still recommended for accurate staging, especially in the high-risk population.
AB - Objectives: To compare the ability of 68Ga -PSMA PET/CT (PSMA PET/CT) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to exclude lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: A multicenter cohort of patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI prior to RP with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) was analyzed. Increased Ga68-PSMA uptake on PET/CT and enlarged (> 10 mm) or abnormal lymph nodes on mpMRI were considered positive findings. The final surgical pathology served as the standard of reference. The negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated for each modality separately, as well as the combined value. Results: Included were 89 patients with D’Amico intermediate (45%) or high-risk (55%) prostate cancer. The median number of extracted LN was 9 (IQR 6-14). LNI was found in 12 (13.5%) patients. The NPV of mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT, and the two tests combined were 87%, 89%, and 90%, in the entire cohort, 95%, 97%, and 97% in patients with intermediate-risk disease, and 80%, 82%, and 83% in patients with high-risk disease, respectively. The median diameter of LN missed by both imaging and the median intranodal tumor diameter was 5.5 (IQR 3–10) mm and 1 (IQR 1–3) mm, respectively. Conclusions: PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrated similar performance in excluding pelvic LNI with NPV of approximately 90%. The combination of both tests does not improve NPV significantly. Therefore, even in the era of advanced imaging, PLND is still recommended for accurate staging, especially in the high-risk population.
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - PSMA positron emission tomography
KW - Pelvic lymph nodes
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Staging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087996658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00261-020-02640-1
DO - 10.1007/s00261-020-02640-1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32671440
AN - SCOPUS:85087996658
SN - 2366-004X
VL - 45
SP - 4194
EP - 4201
JO - Abdominal Radiology
JF - Abdominal Radiology
IS - 12
ER -