A comparative fault defense in contract law

Ariel Porat*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This Article calls for the recognition of a comparative fault defense in contract law. Part I sets the framework for this defense and suggests the situations in which it should apply. These situations are sorted under two headings: cases of noncooperation and cases of overreliance. Part II unfolds the main argument for recognizing the defense and recommends applying the defense only in cases where cooperation or avoidance of overreliance is low cost.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1397-1412
Number of pages16
JournalMichigan Law Review
Volume107
Issue number8
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative fault defense in contract law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this