36-year study reveals stability of a wild wheat population across microhabitats

Tal Dahan-Meir, Thomas James Ellis, Fabrizio Mafessoni, Hanan Sela, Ori Rudich, Jacob Manisterski, Naomi Avivi-Ragolsky, Amir Raz, Moshe Feldman, Yehoshua Anikster, Magnus Nordborg*, Avraham A. Levy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Long-term genetic studies of wild populations are very scarce, but are essential for connecting ecological and population genetics models, and for understanding the dynamics of biodiversity. We present a study of a wild wheat population sampled over a 36-year period at high spatial resolution. We genotyped 832 individuals from regular sampling along transects during the course of the experiment. Genotypes were clustered into ecological microhabitats over scales of tens of metres, and this clustering was remarkably stable over the 36 generations of the study. Simulations show that it is difficult to determine whether this spatial and temporal stability reflects extremely limited dispersal or fine-scale local adaptation to ecological parameters. Using a common-garden experiment, we showed that the genotypes found in distinct microhabitats differ phenotypically. Our results provide a rare insight into the population genetics of a natural population over a long monitoring period.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere17512
JournalMolecular Ecology
Volume33
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2024

Funding

FundersFunder number
University of Haifa
Weizmann Institute of Science
SAERI
Yeda‐Sela Center and Sustainability and Alternative Energy Research Initiative
Tel Aviv University
European Molecular Biology Organization8368

    Keywords

    • adaptation
    • conservation genetics
    • population dynamics
    • population ecology
    • wheat
    • wild populations

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '36-year study reveals stability of a wild wheat population across microhabitats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this