TY - JOUR
T1 - 30-day morbidity and mortality of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one anastomosis gastric bypass
T2 - a propensity score-matched analysis of the GENEVA data
AU - GENEVA collaborators
AU - Singhal, Rishi
AU - Cardoso, Victor Roth
AU - Wiggins, Tom
AU - Super, Jonathan
AU - Ludwig, Christian
AU - Gkoutos, Georgios V.
AU - Mahawar, Kamal
AU - Pędziwiatr, Michał
AU - Major, Piotr
AU - Zarzycki, Piotr
AU - Pantelis, Athanasios
AU - Lapatsanis, Dimitris P.
AU - Stravodimos, Georgios
AU - Matthys, Chris
AU - Focquet, Marc
AU - Vleeschouwers, Wouter
AU - Spaventa, Antonio G.
AU - Zerrweck, Carlos
AU - Vitiello, Antonio
AU - Berardi, Giovanna
AU - Musella, Mario
AU - Sanchez-Meza, Alberto
AU - Cantu, Felipe J.
AU - Mora, Fernando
AU - Cantu, Marco A.
AU - Katakwar, Abhishek
AU - Reddy, D. Nageshwar
AU - Elmaleh, Haitham
AU - Hassan, Mohammad
AU - Elghandour, Abdelrahman
AU - Elbanna, Mohey
AU - Osman, Ahmed
AU - Khan, Athar
AU - layani, Laurent
AU - Kiran, Nalini
AU - Velikorechin, Andrey
AU - Solovyeva, Maria
AU - Melali, Hamid
AU - Shahabi, Shahab
AU - Agrawal, Ashish
AU - Shrivastava, Apoorv
AU - Sharma, Ankur
AU - Narwaria, Bhavya
AU - Narwaria, Mahendra
AU - Raziel, Asnat
AU - Sakran, Nasser
AU - Susmallian, Sergio
AU - Goitein, David
AU - Hazzan, David
AU - Segev, Lior
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Background: There is a paucity of data comparing 30-day morbidity and mortality of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). This study aimed to compare the 30-day safety of SG, RYGB, and OAGB in propensity score-matched cohorts. Materials and methods: This analysis utilised data collected from the GENEVA study which was a multicentre observational cohort study of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) in 185 centres across 42 countries between 01/05/2022 and 31/10/2020 during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. 30-day complications were categorised according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. Patients receiving SG, RYGB, or OAGB were propensity-matched according to baseline characteristics and 30-day complications were compared between groups. Results: In total, 6770 patients (SG 3983; OAGB 702; RYGB 2085) were included in this analysis. Prior to matching, RYGB was associated with highest 30-day complication rate (SG 5.8%; OAGB 7.5%; RYGB 8.0% (p = 0.006)). On multivariate regression modelling, Insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolaemia were associated with increased 30-day complications. Being a non-smoker was associated with reduced complication rates. When compared to SG as a reference category, RYGB, but not OAGB, was associated with an increased rate of 30-day complications. A total of 702 pairs of SG and OAGB were propensity score-matched. The complication rate in the SG group was 7.3% (n = 51) as compared to 7.5% (n = 53) in the OAGB group (p = 0.68). Similarly, 2085 pairs of SG and RYGB were propensity score-matched. The complication rate in the SG group was 6.1% (n = 127) as compared to 7.9% (n = 166) in the RYGB group (p = 0.09). And, 702 pairs of OAGB and RYGB were matched. The complication rate in both groups was the same at 7.5 % (n = 53; p = 0.07). Conclusions: This global study found no significant difference in the 30-day morbidity and mortality of SG, RYGB, and OAGB in propensity score-matched cohorts.
AB - Background: There is a paucity of data comparing 30-day morbidity and mortality of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). This study aimed to compare the 30-day safety of SG, RYGB, and OAGB in propensity score-matched cohorts. Materials and methods: This analysis utilised data collected from the GENEVA study which was a multicentre observational cohort study of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) in 185 centres across 42 countries between 01/05/2022 and 31/10/2020 during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. 30-day complications were categorised according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. Patients receiving SG, RYGB, or OAGB were propensity-matched according to baseline characteristics and 30-day complications were compared between groups. Results: In total, 6770 patients (SG 3983; OAGB 702; RYGB 2085) were included in this analysis. Prior to matching, RYGB was associated with highest 30-day complication rate (SG 5.8%; OAGB 7.5%; RYGB 8.0% (p = 0.006)). On multivariate regression modelling, Insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolaemia were associated with increased 30-day complications. Being a non-smoker was associated with reduced complication rates. When compared to SG as a reference category, RYGB, but not OAGB, was associated with an increased rate of 30-day complications. A total of 702 pairs of SG and OAGB were propensity score-matched. The complication rate in the SG group was 7.3% (n = 51) as compared to 7.5% (n = 53) in the OAGB group (p = 0.68). Similarly, 2085 pairs of SG and RYGB were propensity score-matched. The complication rate in the SG group was 6.1% (n = 127) as compared to 7.9% (n = 166) in the RYGB group (p = 0.09). And, 702 pairs of OAGB and RYGB were matched. The complication rate in both groups was the same at 7.5 % (n = 53; p = 0.07). Conclusions: This global study found no significant difference in the 30-day morbidity and mortality of SG, RYGB, and OAGB in propensity score-matched cohorts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121334402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41366-021-01048-1
DO - 10.1038/s41366-021-01048-1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34912046
AN - SCOPUS:85121334402
SN - 0307-0565
VL - 46
SP - 750
EP - 757
JO - International Journal of Obesity
JF - International Journal of Obesity
IS - 4
ER -