25-Gauge Vitrectomy with Epiretinal Membrane and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Eyes with Very Good Visual Acuity

Elad Moisseiev*, Michael Kinori, Iris Moroz, Ethan Priel, Joseph Moisseiev

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and preoperative visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better. Methods: 44 eyes that underwent PPV and ERM peeling were included in this retrospective study. Data retrieved included demographic information, VA and intraocular pressure (IOP) preoperatively, after 1 month, 6 months and at final visit, presence of metamorphopsia, surgical reports, and occurrence of any complications. Results: Mean preoperative VA was 20/36 (0.24 ± 0.08 logMAR) and had improved to 20/27 (0.13 ± 0.11 logMAR) at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Thirty (68.1%) eyes had improved by 1 line of vision or more, and 10 (22.7%) achieved final 20/20 vision. Significant improvement in vision was achieved earlier in eyes that underwent vitrectomy combined with cataract extraction. Preoperative OCT scans demonstrated preserved outer retinal layer structure. Conclusions: PPV and ERM peeling is a safe and effective procedure in eyes with very good preoperative VA. PPV combined with cataract extraction offers a faster improvement in VA than PPV alone with deferred cataract surgery. PPV should be considered in symptomatic eyes with ERM and VA of 20/40 or better, in order to preserve and even improve the VA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1387-1392
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Eye Research
Volume41
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Epiretinal membrane
  • good visual acuity
  • vitrectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '25-Gauge Vitrectomy with Epiretinal Membrane and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Eyes with Very Good Visual Acuity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this