TY - JOUR
T1 - 18F-FDG PET-CT postoperative changes after maxillectomy
T2 - Findings and pitfalls in interpretation
AU - Davidson, Tima
AU - Nissan, Johnatan
AU - Krichmar, Maria
AU - Lotan, Eyal
AU - Shrot, Shai
AU - Gluck, Iris
AU - Lawson, Paul
AU - Yahalom, Ran
AU - Duvdevani, Shay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Objective: We investigated the findings and pitfalls of FDG-PET/CT scanning after maxillectomy with reconstruction/rehabilitation procedures, in patients with head and neck malignancies treated during nine years at one tertiary medical centre. Methods: Fourteen patients (10 males), aged 22–84 years, underwent 17 reconstruction/rehabilitation maxillectomy surgeries and 35 PET/CT scans. Postoperative PET/CT findings were correlated with clinical and imaging follow-up. Results: Increased FDG uptake, mean SUVmax 2.4 ± 1.4 (range 0.3–4.3), was observed at the postoperative bed following 12 of 17 surgeries (71%; 10 obturators, two mesh reconstructions). Following the remaining 5/17 surgeries (three with a fat flap and two without any reconstructions), abnormal FDG uptake was not observed at the postoperative bed. CT features of postoperative sites included: non-homogeneous mixed iso/hyperdense structures (hollow or filled) with multiple surrounding and/or inside air bubbles (“sponge appearance”) and mucosal thickening along the postoperative bed wall (in all cases with obturator implants); rich fat density material in reconstructions with a fat flap and in closures without reconstruction, and radiopaque elongated structures in mesh reconstructions. No correlation was found of the mean SUVmax in initial scans, with the time from the surgery date (10 ± 6 months; r=0.04, P=0.90), or with the mean SUVmax in final scans (at 25± 17 months, P=0.17). Conclusions:: Increased FDG uptake, together with corresponding non-specific CT features, may persist for a prolonged period after surgery with obturators and mesh implantations, mimicking malignancy or infection. Awareness of variations in postoperative PET-CT appearance can help avoid false interpretations and redundant invasive procedures.
AB - Objective: We investigated the findings and pitfalls of FDG-PET/CT scanning after maxillectomy with reconstruction/rehabilitation procedures, in patients with head and neck malignancies treated during nine years at one tertiary medical centre. Methods: Fourteen patients (10 males), aged 22–84 years, underwent 17 reconstruction/rehabilitation maxillectomy surgeries and 35 PET/CT scans. Postoperative PET/CT findings were correlated with clinical and imaging follow-up. Results: Increased FDG uptake, mean SUVmax 2.4 ± 1.4 (range 0.3–4.3), was observed at the postoperative bed following 12 of 17 surgeries (71%; 10 obturators, two mesh reconstructions). Following the remaining 5/17 surgeries (three with a fat flap and two without any reconstructions), abnormal FDG uptake was not observed at the postoperative bed. CT features of postoperative sites included: non-homogeneous mixed iso/hyperdense structures (hollow or filled) with multiple surrounding and/or inside air bubbles (“sponge appearance”) and mucosal thickening along the postoperative bed wall (in all cases with obturator implants); rich fat density material in reconstructions with a fat flap and in closures without reconstruction, and radiopaque elongated structures in mesh reconstructions. No correlation was found of the mean SUVmax in initial scans, with the time from the surgery date (10 ± 6 months; r=0.04, P=0.90), or with the mean SUVmax in final scans (at 25± 17 months, P=0.17). Conclusions:: Increased FDG uptake, together with corresponding non-specific CT features, may persist for a prolonged period after surgery with obturators and mesh implantations, mimicking malignancy or infection. Awareness of variations in postoperative PET-CT appearance can help avoid false interpretations and redundant invasive procedures.
KW - F18-FDG PET/CT
KW - Maxillectomy
KW - Pitfalls
KW - Postoperative changes
KW - Reconstruction/rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115754207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/dmfr.20200574
DO - 10.1259/dmfr.20200574
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33882254
AN - SCOPUS:85115754207
SN - 0250-832X
VL - 50
JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
IS - 7
M1 - 20200574
ER -